H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jana Nejedly vs Elna Reinach H2H: 0-1
Elna Reinach holds a 1–0 lead over Jana Nejedly in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elna Reinach leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Elna Reinach won the 1994 Quebec City third round 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 57
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 1994* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Elna Reinach | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Jana Nejedly | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Nejedly | #914 | #64 | 488 | 1,626 | 49 | 104 | 32.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Elna Reinach | #342 | #26 | 33 | 1,865 | 145 | 170 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Nejedly | Elna Reinach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #95 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #328 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #56 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #82 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #130 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #109 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #75 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #88 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #69 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #96 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #233 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |