H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jana Nejedly vs Greta Arn H2H: 1-2
Greta Arn holds a 2–1 lead over Jana Nejedly in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jana Nejedly leads 1–0 on clay, while Greta Arn leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Greta Arn won the 2002 Birmingham second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2002* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Greta Arn | 7-5 6-4 | Jana Nejedly | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2001* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jana Nejedly | 6-3 6-4 | Greta Arn | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2001* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Greta Arn | 3-6 7-6(4) 12-10 | Jana Nejedly | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Nejedly | #914 | #64 | 488 | 1,626 | 49 | 104 | 32.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Greta Arn | #448 | #40 | 1,370 | 1,695 | 58 | 91 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Nejedly | Greta Arn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #328 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #82 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #130 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #118 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #91 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #75 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #88 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #69 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #96 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #225 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #233 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #162 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #235 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #88 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #63 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #114 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #406 | 1,550 | 0 | 2 |