H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jana Nejedly vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 1-1
Jana Nejedly and Julie Halard-Decugis are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jana Nejedly leads 1–0 on grass, while Julie Halard-Decugis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1999 Auckland third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 1999* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-3 6-3 | Jana Nejedly | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1995* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Jana Nejedly | 7-5 4-6 6-4 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Nejedly | #914 | #64 | 488 | 1,626 | 49 | 104 | 32.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Nejedly | Julie Halard-Decugis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #328 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1995 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #82 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #130 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #75 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1999 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #88 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #69 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #96 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2002 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #233 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 |