H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jana Nejedly vs Liezel Huber H2H: 1-0

Jana Nejedly holds a 1–0 lead over Liezel Huber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jana Nejedly leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Nejedly won the 2000 Kuala Lumpur round of 32 6-4 7-6(4).

CAN Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jana Nejedly #70 6-4 7-6(4) Liezel Huber #612 Match data Nov 7, 2000* R32 Kuala Lumpur Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jana Nejedly #914 #64 488 1,625 49 105 31.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Liezel Huber #772 #131 242 1,500 4 13 23.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jana Nejedly Liezel Huber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1993 0–3 0.0% #328 1,462 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% #212 1,487 0 0
20 1994 3–9 25.0% #139 1,467 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #156 1,482 0 0
21 1995 11–12 47.8% #82 1,580 0 0 1998 1–5 16.7% #150 1,450 0 0
22 1996 3–9 25.0% #130 1,552 0 0
23 1997 0–2 0.0% #137 1,541 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% #438 1,430 0 0
24 1998 4–9 30.8% #75 1,556 0 0 2001 3–4 42.9% #176 1,476 0 0
25 1999 5–13 27.8% #88 1,496 0 0
26 2000 12–20 37.5% #69 1,528 0 0
27 2001 8–17 32.0% #96 1,520 0 0
28 2002 3–11 21.4% #233 1,423 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jana Nejedly Liezel Huber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1997 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1998 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2001 4 9 13 30.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2002 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 31 58 89 34.8% 8 22 30 26.7% 2 10 12 16.7% 8 15 23 34.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jana Nejedly Liezel Huber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1993 1463 89.4 +32 0.0% -4.33 +0.21 1996 1488 98.6 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–1 +0.17
20 1994 1468 119.4 +17 28.6% -1.54 2–2 (50%) +0.14 1997 1483 101.4 33.3% -1.33 0–1 -0.19
21 1995 1580 127.6 -12 49.1% +0.02 3–4 (43%) 1–1 -0.69 1998 1450 96.4 +12 +102 21.4% -2.14 1–1 1–0 +0.28
22 1996 1552 113.3 +10 34.5% -1.14 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 95.3 -0.52
23 1997 1541 109.4 0.0% -3.75 -0.12 2000 1431 97.5 0.0% -2.25 0–1 +0.06
24 1998 1556 109.7 +2 -49 31.0% -1.31 2–1 (67%) 0–2 -1.14 2001 1476 110.6 +14 50.0% -0.19 0–2 1–0 +0.03
25 1999 1496 102.5 +42 -14 27.5% -1.72 3–1 (75%) 1–0 +0.67
26 2000 1528 107.0 -2 -12 -40 36.5% -1.16 7–3 (70%) 3–4 (43%) 105.5 +0.89
27 2001 1520 113.4 +22 -60 36.8% -0.88 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.7 +0.87
28 2002 1423 84.2 +66 23.3% -1.97 1–1 1–1 +1.39
Career 1625 113.2 +15 -29 -40 34.0% -1.19 21–21 (50%) 8–15 (35%) 101.1 +1.10 1500 102.5 +13 +102 32.5% -1.15 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 96.5 +2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.