H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jana Nejedly vs Patty Fendick H2H: 1-0
Jana Nejedly holds a 1–0 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jana Nejedly leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Nejedly won the 1995 San Diego second round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 1995* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Jana Nejedly | 6-2 7-5 | Patty Fendick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Nejedly | #914 | #64 | 488 | 1,626 | 49 | 104 | 32.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patty Fendick | #360 | #19 | 55 | 1,883 | 199 | 162 | 55.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Nejedly | Patty Fendick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #328 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #120 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #82 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #130 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #22 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #75 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #31 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1999 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #88 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #69 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #56 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #96 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #233 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #27 | 1,839 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #50 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |