H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jana Nejedly vs Rika Hiraki H2H: 1-0
Jana Nejedly holds a 1–0 lead over Rika Hiraki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jana Nejedly leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jana Nejedly won the 1994 Tokyo Pan Pacific third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 54
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 1994* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Jana Nejedly | 6-3 7-5 | Rika Hiraki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Nejedly | #914 | #64 | 488 | 1,626 | 49 | 104 | 32.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rika Hiraki | #965 | #72 | 325 | 1,589 | 48 | 93 | 34.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Nejedly | Rika Hiraki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #328 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #122 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #82 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #134 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #130 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #187 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #75 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #88 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #93 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #69 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #168 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #96 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #233 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |