H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jana Nejedly vs Samantha Reeves H2H: 1-0

Jana Nejedly holds a 1–0 lead over Samantha Reeves in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jana Nejedly leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Nejedly won the 2000 Canadian Open round of 64 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jana Nejedly
CAN Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Samantha Reeves
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jana Nejedly #69 6-3 6-3 Samantha Reeves #163 Match data Aug 16, 2000* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jana Nejedly #914 #64 488 1,625 49 105 31.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Samantha Reeves #864 #62 523 1,629 30 59 33.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jana Nejedly Samantha Reeves
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1993 0–3 0.0% #328 1,462 0 0 1998 2–8 20.0% #111 1,480 0 0
20 1994 3–9 25.0% #139 1,467 0 0 1999 4–8 33.3% #121 1,480 0 0
21 1995 11–12 47.8% #82 1,580 0 0 2000 1–4 20.0% #171 1,446 0 0
22 1996 3–9 25.0% #130 1,552 0 0 2001 4–3 57.1% #106 1,515 0 0
23 1997 0–2 0.0% #137 1,541 0 0 2002 8–14 36.4% #108 1,544 0 0
24 1998 4–9 30.8% #75 1,556 0 0 2003 8–10 44.4% #74 1,588 0 0
25 1999 5–13 27.8% #88 1,496 0 0 2004 3–12 20.0% #198 1,526 0 0
26 2000 12–20 37.5% #69 1,528 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2001 8–17 32.0% #96 1,520 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2002 3–11 21.4% #233 1,423 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jana Nejedly Samantha Reeves
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1994 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1999 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1995 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
23 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 5 7 12 41.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1998 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2001 4 9 13 30.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 31 58 89 34.8% 8 22 30 26.7% 2 10 12 16.7% 8 15 23 34.8% — 14 27 41 34.1% 11 22 33 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jana Nejedly Samantha Reeves
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1993 1463 89.4 — — — — +32 — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — +0.21 1998 1480 114.3 — — — — +27 +68 — 29.2% -1.17 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.17
20 1994 1468 119.4 — — — — +17 — — 28.6% -1.54 2–2 (50%) — — +0.14 1999 1481 106.1 — — — — +28 +49 — 34.6% -1.65 1–1 1–0 — +0.52
21 1995 1580 127.6 — — — — -12 — — 49.1% +0.02 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.69 2000 1447 92.1 — — — — — +34 — 18.2% -1.45 1–0 0–1 — +0.50
22 1996 1552 113.3 — — — — +10 — — 34.5% -1.14 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 95.3 -0.52 2001 1515 113.3 — — — — +30 — — 47.1% +0.12 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — +0.29
23 1997 1541 109.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.12 2002 1545 121.7 — — — — +16 -68 — 42.6% -0.48 3–7 (30%) 4–5 (44%) 96.7 -0.91
24 1998 1556 109.7 — — — — +2 -49 — 31.0% -1.31 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — -1.14 2003 1589 112.2 -1.00 +0.72 0.861 46.5% -29 -69 +14 41.0% -0.92 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.54
25 1999 1496 102.5 — — — — +42 -14 — 27.5% -1.72 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +0.67 2004 1526 110.0 -3.84 -1.12 0.609 38.9% -9 -32 — 24.2% -1.70 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.74
26 2000 1528 107.0 — — — — -2 -12 -40 36.5% -1.16 7–3 (70%) 3–4 (43%) 105.5 +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2001 1520 113.4 — — — — +22 -60 — 36.8% -0.88 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.7 +0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2002 1423 84.2 — — — — +66 — — 23.3% -1.97 1–1 1–1 — +1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1625 113.2 — — — — +15 -29 -40 34.0% -1.19 21–21 (50%) 8–15 (35%) 101.1 +1.10 — 1630 116.7 -2.07 +0.03 0.755 43.6% +12 -24 +14 35.8% -0.99 15–15 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 103.4 -1.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.