H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jana Nejedly vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 0-2
Silvija Talaja holds a 2–0 lead over Jana Nejedly in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Silvija Talaja leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Silvija Talaja won the 2001 Miami second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2001* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Silvija Talaja | 6-3 6-4 | Jana Nejedly | Match data |
| May 26, 2000* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Silvija Talaja | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | Jana Nejedly | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Nejedly | #914 | #64 | 488 | 1,626 | 49 | 104 | 32.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Silvija Talaja | #1,214 | #18 | 1,376 | 1,811 | 130 | 151 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Nejedly | Silvija Talaja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #328 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #82 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #29 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #130 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #29 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #75 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #88 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #69 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #96 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2002 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #233 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |