H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jana Nejedly vs Tami Whitlinger Jones H2H: 1-1
Jana Nejedly and Tami Whitlinger Jones are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tami Whitlinger Jones leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jana Nejedly leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tami Whitlinger Jones won the 1996 Canadian Indoor fourth round 3-6 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 1996* | Canadian Indoor | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tami Whitlinger Jones | 3-6 7-6 6-4 | Jana Nejedly | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1995* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jana Nejedly | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Nejedly | #914 | #64 | 488 | 1,626 | 49 | 104 | 32.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | — | — | — | 1,786 | 106 | 135 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Nejedly | Tami Whitlinger Jones | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #328 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #82 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #130 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #75 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #88 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #69 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #96 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #233 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |