H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jane Preyer vs Ivanna Madruga H2H: 0-1

Ivanna Madruga holds a 1–0 lead over Jane Preyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivanna Madruga leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivanna Madruga won the 1980 Hilton Head round of 64 6-0 6-1.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ivanna Madruga 6-0 6-1 Jane Preyer Match data Apr 9, 1980* R64 Hilton Head WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jane Preyer 1,685 36 43 45.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ivanna Madruga 1,916 131 88 59.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jane Preyer Ivanna Madruga
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1975 1–1 50.0% 1,504 0 0
16 1977 0–1 0.0% 1,489 0 0
17 1978 6–6 50.0% 1,555 0 0
18 1979 7–10 41.2% 1,628 0 0
19 1980 29–18 61.7% 1,799 0 0
20 1981 17–14 54.8% 1,752 0 0
21 1982 27–13 67.5% 1,822 0 1
22 1976 1–1 50.0% 1,496 0 0 1983 25–12 67.6% 1,881 0 1
23 1977 1–3 25.0% 1,468 0 0 1984 14–8 63.6% 1,830 0 1
24 1978 4–2 66.7% 1,528 0 0
25 1979 3–3 50.0% 1,522 0 0 1986 5–5 50.0% 1,775 0 1
26 1980 8–11 42.1% 1,529 0 0
27 1981 11–9 55.0% 1,645 0 0
28 1982 8–11 42.1% 1,634 0 0
29 1983 0–3 0.0% 1,584 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jane Preyer Ivanna Madruga
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1975 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1980 10 6 16 62.5% 19 8 27 70.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1982 2 3 5 40.0% 25 10 35 71.4%
22 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1984 14 8 22 63.6%
24 1978 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1979 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 5 5 10 50.0%
26 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1981 0 4 4 0.0% 11 4 15 73.3%
28 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 1 9 10 10.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 27 20 47 57.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 22 18 40 55.0% 99 53 152 65.1% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jane Preyer Ivanna Madruga
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1975 1505 101.3 50.0% -0.50 +0.30
16 1977 1490 +0.22
17 1978 1556 122.4 +14 55.2% +0.10 1–4 (20%) 1–0 +0.29
18 1979 1628 139.2 +21 -20 -52 45.0% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 97.3 -0.36
19 1980 1799 145.3 -111 +67 59.8% +1.16 9–3 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 106.3 -5.59
20 1981 1752 140.7 -101 +165 -157 55.6% +0.39 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 100.1 -2.27
21 1982 1822 151.7 -199 +149 64.4% +1.49 6–4 (60%) 1–1 -2.76
22 1976 1497 98.4 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 +0.09 1983 1882 143.6 -151 +78 65.9% +1.35 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 +0.61
23 1977 1468 92.6 +55 30.0% -1.30 1–1 0–2 +0.80 1984 1830 128.9 +30 63.3% +1.12 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) +0.18
24 1978 1529 110.5 +90 60.0% +0.47 2–1 (67%) 0–2 +0.66
25 1979 1522 100.3 +38 42.9% -0.22 2–0 1–1 +1.09 1986 1776 112.3 +16 45.5% -0.23 2–0 1–2 (33%) +0.28
26 1980 1530 93.2 +86 39.5% -1.05 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 102.9 +0.82
27 1981 1645 121.7 -135 +159 52.2% -0.22 4–2 (67%) 1–0 +0.70
28 1982 1634 121.9 -162 +124 44.4% -0.58 3–4 (43%) 1–0 +0.14
29 1983 1584 95.2 0.0% -3.00 +0.36
Career 1686 111.6 -150 +38 +121 45.1% -0.57 18–12 (60%) 6–8 (43%) 103.5 +5.90 1917 148.0 -116 +85 -109 59.2% +0.89 30–28 (52%) 12–18 (40%) 98.1 -4.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.