H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Jane Preyer vs Karen Smith H2H: 1-0

Jane Preyer holds a 1–0 lead over Karen Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jane Preyer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jane Preyer won the 1981 Perth 2 round of 64 6-2 6-3.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jane Preyer 6-2 6-3 Karen Smith Match data Nov 18, 1981* R64 Perth 2 WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jane Preyer 1,685 36 43 45.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Karen Smith 1,521 3 6 33.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jane Preyer Karen Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1981 0–1 0.0% 1,486 0 0
20 1982 3–1 75.0% 1,521 0 1
21 1983 0–1 0.0% 1,514 0 1
22 1976 1–1 50.0% 1,496 0 0 1984 0–2 0.0% 1,494 0 1
23 1977 1–3 25.0% 1,468 0 0 1985 0–1 0.0% 1,476 0 1
24 1978 4–2 66.7% 1,528 0 0
25 1979 3–3 50.0% 1,522 0 0
26 1980 8–11 42.1% 1,529 0 0
27 1981 11–9 55.0% 1,645 0 0
28 1982 8–11 42.1% 1,634 0 0
29 1983 0–3 0.0% 1,584 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jane Preyer Karen Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1981 1486 98.9 0.0% -3.50 +0.13
20 1982 1522 102.6 63.6% +0.27 2–1 (67%) +0.32
21 1983 1515 93.4 0.0% -5.50 -0.14
22 1976 1497 98.4 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 +0.09 1984 1494 100.6 20.0% -1.80 0–1 +0.14
23 1977 1468 92.6 +55 30.0% -1.30 1–1 0–2 +0.80 1985 1476 94.9 0.0% -4.00 +0.07
24 1978 1529 110.5 +90 60.0% +0.47 2–1 (67%) 0–2 +0.66
25 1979 1522 100.3 +38 42.9% -0.22 2–0 1–1 +1.09
26 1980 1530 93.2 +86 39.5% -1.05 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 102.9 +0.82
27 1981 1645 121.7 -135 +159 52.2% -0.22 4–2 (67%) 1–0 +0.70
28 1982 1634 121.9 -162 +124 44.4% -0.58 3–4 (43%) 1–0 +0.14
29 1983 1584 95.2 0.0% -3.00 +0.36
Career 1686 111.6 -150 +38 +121 45.1% -0.57 18–12 (60%) 6–8 (43%) 103.5 +5.90 1522 96.7 36.4% -1.46 2–2 (50%) +5.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.