H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Betty Ann Grubb H2H: 3-0
Janet Newberry holds a 3–0 lead over Betty Ann Grubb in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Janet Newberry leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janet Newberry won the 1979 Rome third round 6-0 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 1979* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Janet Newberry | 6-0 7-6 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
| May 30, 1970* | Tulsa | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Janet Newberry | 4-6 8-6 6-4 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
| May 10, 1969* | Los Angeles Socal Chps | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Janet Newberry | 6-3 6-1 | Betty Ann Grubb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Betty Ann Grubb | — | — | — | 1,822 | 124 | 112 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Janet Newberry | Betty Ann Grubb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 5 |
| 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 5 |
| 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 6 |
| 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 7 |
| 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 7 |
| 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 7 |
| 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 7 |
| 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 |
| 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | 1979 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | 1980 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |