H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Cecilia Martinez H2H: 2-1
Janet Newberry holds a 2–1 lead over Cecilia Martinez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Janet Newberry leads 2–0 on clay, while Cecilia Martinez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cecilia Martinez won the 1976 Phoenix second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 79
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 1976* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Cecilia Martinez | 6-3 6-4 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1976* | Westchester | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Janet Newberry | 6-7 7-5 7-6 | Cecilia Martinez | Match data |
| Aug 11, 1976* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Janet Newberry | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Cecilia Martinez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Cecilia Martinez | — | — | — | 1,710 | 121 | 157 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Cecilia Martinez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | 1968 | 26–18 | 59.1% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 12–25 | 32.4% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | 1973 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |