H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Iris Riedel Kuhn H2H: 2-0
Janet Newberry holds a 2–0 lead over Iris Riedel Kuhn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Janet Newberry leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Janet Newberry won the 1977 Toronto third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 72
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1977 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Janet Newberry | 6-4 6-3 | Iris Riedel Kuhn | Match data |
| May 21, 1977* | Rome | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Janet Newberry | 6-3 6-1 | Iris Riedel Kuhn | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Iris Riedel Kuhn | — | — | — | 1,845 | 104 | 96 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Iris Riedel Kuhn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 16–13 | 55.2% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | 1979 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | 1980 | 28–9 | 75.7% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 7 |