H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Isabel Fernandez De Soto H2H: 1-0
Janet Newberry holds a 1–0 lead over Isabel Fernandez De Soto in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Janet Newberry leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Janet Newberry won the 1971 Chichester semifinal 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 75
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 1971* | Chichester | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Janet Newberry | 6-1 6-2 | Isabel Fernandez De Soto | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Isabel Fernandez De Soto | — | — | — | 1,783 | 90 | 106 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Isabel Fernandez De Soto | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 16–17 | 48.5% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 7 |