H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Jackie Fayter H2H: 1-0
Janet Newberry holds a 1–0 lead over Jackie Fayter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Janet Newberry leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Janet Newberry won the 1971 Chichester fourth round 6-4 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 75
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 1971* | Chichester | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Janet Newberry | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Jackie Fayter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Jackie Fayter | — | — | — | 1,723 | 121 | 143 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Jackie Fayter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 17–29 | 37.0% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 24–17 | 58.5% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 4 |