H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Jeanne Evert H2H: 3-1
Janet Newberry holds a 3–1 lead over Jeanne Evert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Janet Newberry leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jeanne Evert leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Janet Newberry won the 1978 San Antonio third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 1978* | San Antonio | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Janet Newberry | 6-4 6-4 | Jeanne Evert | Match data |
| Oct 6, 1977* | Atlanta | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Janet Newberry | 6-4 6-1 | Jeanne Evert | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1974* | Newport | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Janet Newberry | 3-6 6-4 6-0 | Jeanne Evert | Match data |
| Apr 11, 1974* | Sarasota | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Jeanne Evert | 6-2 6-3 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Jeanne Evert | — | — | — | 1,929 | 132 | 90 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Jeanne Evert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 7–3 | 70.0% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 16–9 | 64.0% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 15 | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 19–11 | 63.3% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 3 |
| 16 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 6 |
| 17 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 31–19 | 62.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 9 |
| 18 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,870 | 0 | 11 |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 11 |
| 20 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 11 |
| 21 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |