Janet Newberry
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mima Jausovec | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 27, 1978 | H2H |
| Rosie Casals | 0 | 9 | 9 | Feb 3, 1978 | H2H |
| Laura Dupont | 5 | 4 | 9 | Feb 2, 1978 | H2H |
| Chris Evert | 0 | 8 | 8 | May 11, 1979 | H2H |
| Kerry Reid | 1 | 7 | 8 | Feb 23, 1978 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Kate Latham H2H: 3-1
Janet Newberry holds a 3–1 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Janet Newberry leads 2–0 on grass, while Kate Latham leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1979 Indianapolis round of 64 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kate Latham | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Janet Newberry | Match data | Aug 8, 1979* | R64 | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Janet Newberry | 6-2 3-6 7-5 | Kate Latham | Match data | Jun 16, 1978* | R16 | Chichester | WTA 250 | Grass |
| Janet Newberry | 6-3 7-5 | Kate Latham | Match data | Jun 14, 1973* | R32 | Beckenham | WTA 250 | Grass |
| Janet Newberry | 6-4 6-3 | Kate Latham | Match data | Oct 3, 1969* | R32 | Berkeley | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,922 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Kate Latham | — | — | — | 1,864 | 198 | 202 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Kate Latham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 40–16 | 71.4% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,875 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 24–28 | 46.2% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 6 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Kate Latham | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | 1968 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 1972 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 1973 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 20 | 9 | 29 | 69.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1974 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 17 | 6 | 23 | 73.9% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1976 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1975 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1977 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1976 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1978 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1977 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1979 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1978 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% |
| 26 | 1980 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 0 | 4 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 73 | 50 | 123 | 59.3% | 72 | 48 | 120 | 60.0% | 60 | 41 | 101 | 59.4% | 28 | 43 | 71 | 39.4% | — | 70 | 67 | 137 | 51.1% | 26 | 38 | 64 | 40.6% | 41 | 33 | 74 | 55.4% | 27 | 55 | 82 | 32.9% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Kate Latham | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 1968 | 1542 | 104.3 | — | — | — | — | +45 | — | — | 55.6% | +0.41 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 1632 | 120.1 | — | — | — | — | +106 | — | -86 | 67.4% | +1.19 | 2–3 (40%) | — | — | +1.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 1719 | 128.8 | — | — | — | — | +177 | -163 | -147 | 70.0% | +1.70 | 4–4 (50%) | 0–1 | — | +3.95 | 1969 | 1489 | 99.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | -0.07 |
| 17 | 1971 | 1758 | 132.0 | — | — | — | — | +111 | — | -30 | 56.9% | +0.65 | 4–1 (80%) | — | — | +0.89 | 1970 | 1476 | 93.6 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 25.0% | -2.63 | — | — | — | +0.42 |
| 18 | 1972 | 1707 | 131.6 | — | — | — | — | +164 | -98 | -1 | 54.3% | +0.39 | 5–4 (56%) | 0–2 | — | -0.95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 1852 | 140.9 | — | — | — | — | -29 | -44 | -119 | 55.8% | +0.08 | 11–8 (58%) | 7–1 (88%) | 106.5 | -4.59 | 1972 | 1503 | 99.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +39 | — | 45.5% | -0.54 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.62 |
| 20 | 1974 | 1813 | 140.5 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -63 | -20 | 50.5% | +0.13 | 4–5 (44%) | 5–5 (50%) | 99.4 | -2.47 | 1973 | 1587 | 129.0 | — | — | — | — | -41 | — | 0 | 48.3% | +0.14 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.26 |
| 21 | 1975 | 1904 | 152.7 | — | — | — | — | -63 | +15 | -117 | 57.6% | +0.47 | 6–6 (50%) | 6–1 (86%) | 104.5 | -5.60 | 1974 | 1828 | 140.0 | — | — | — | — | -65 | -181 | -31 | 68.9% | +1.55 | 6–8 (43%) | 4–4 (50%) | 99.0 | +3.26 |
| 22 | 1976 | 1863 | 123.7 | — | — | — | — | -83 | +57 | -40 | 51.8% | -0.23 | 7–1 (88%) | 3–1 (75%) | 107.1 | -1.77 | 1975 | 1685 | 132.9 | — | — | — | — | +12 | -76 | — | 45.3% | -0.03 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–7 (13%) | 89.6 | -0.75 |
| 23 | 1977 | 1875 | 146.0 | — | — | — | — | -74 | +55 | -101 | 52.8% | +0.28 | 6–6 (50%) | 2–5 (29%) | 95.9 | -3.22 | 1976 | 1676 | 107.6 | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | — | 57.1% | +1.00 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | +2.30 |
| 24 | 1978 | 1831 | 138.7 | — | — | — | — | -69 | +30 | +11 | 50.7% | +0.12 | 5–4 (56%) | 0–4 (0%) | 95.6 | -2.30 | 1977 | 1749 | 140.9 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -119 | — | 54.2% | +0.34 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–1 (80%) | 103.9 | -0.90 |
| 25 | 1979 | 1681 | 129.3 | — | — | — | — | +2 | +125 | +112 | 39.1% | -0.90 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–4 (50%) | 97.3 | +0.41 | 1978 | 1661 | 118.3 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -10 | +69 | 43.3% | -0.58 | 6–3 (67%) | 4–2 (67%) | 105.3 | +2.03 |
| 26 | 1980 | 1644 | 112.8 | — | — | — | — | -10 | — | +207 | 60.0% | +0.76 | 4–3 (57%) | 1–1 | — | +2.97 | 1979 | 1852 | 149.5 | — | — | — | — | -20 | -164 | -96 | 45.5% | -0.29 | 8–7 (53%) | 4–4 (50%) | 102.4 | -2.22 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1749 | 133.1 | — | — | — | — | -30 | — | +16 | 51.5% | +0.05 | 5–10 (33%) | 7–4 (64%) | 96.7 | -1.81 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1774 | 142.7 | — | — | — | — | -17 | — | +6 | 52.1% | +0.14 | 5–7 (42%) | 6–5 (55%) | 97.1 | -1.96 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1685 | 128.0 | — | — | — | — | +51 | -102 | +34 | 44.5% | -0.56 | 10–5 (67%) | 5–2 (71%) | 106.2 | -0.31 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1624 | 115.0 | — | — | — | — | +51 | -49 | +71 | 40.3% | -0.61 | 7–9 (44%) | 3–6 (33%) | 96.8 | +0.84 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1492 | 91.5 | — | — | — | — | +52 | +30 | — | 8.3% | -3.08 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.50 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1527 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.40 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.05 |
| Career | — | 1922 | 142.9 | — | — | — | — | +13 | +8 | -28 | 54.9% | +0.32 | 62–49 (56%) | 28–25 (53%) | 101.7 | -2.59 | — | 1864 | 138.0 | — | — | — | — | -3 | -77 | -8 | 49.1% | -0.03 | 56–62 (47%) | 41–38 (52%) | 100.8 | +0.44 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Kate Latham
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 10 | 10 | Mar 13, 1982 | H2H |
| Chris Evert | 0 | 8 | 8 | Aug 13, 1983 | H2H |
| Sue Barker | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 12, 1983 | H2H |
| Dianne Fromholtz | 4 | 3 | 7 | Jan 21, 1982 | H2H |
| Pam Teeguarden | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jun 22, 1983 | H2H |