H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Janet Newberry vs Katja Ebbinghaus H2H: 1-0

Janet Newberry holds a 1–0 lead over Katja Ebbinghaus in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Janet Newberry leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Janet Newberry won the 1972 Wimbledon round of 128 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Janet Newberry

USA Age 73 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H

1 – 0

1 main-draw meetings

Katja Ebbinghaus

FRG Age 78

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Janet Newberry	6-3 6-1	Katja Ebbinghaus	Match data	Jun 28, 1972*	R128	Wimbledon	Grand Slam	Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Janet Newberry	—	—	—	1,922	238	187	56.0%	0	0	0	1	7	8
Katja Ebbinghaus	—	—	—	1,878	179	146	55.1%	0	0	0	0	7	7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Janet Newberry							Katja Ebbinghaus
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
14	1968	7–5	58.3%	—	1,542	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
15	1969	13–6	68.4%	—	1,631	0	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1970	20–7	74.1%	—	1,718	0	5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1971	15–9	62.5%	—	1,757	0	5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1972	20–17	54.1%	—	1,707	0	5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1973	32–24	57.1%	—	1,851	0	5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1974	22–22	50.0%	—	1,812	0	5	1968	4–6	40.0%	—	1,493	0	0
21	1975	31–22	58.5%	—	1,903	0	6	1969	10–9	52.6%	—	1,559	0	0
22	1976	14–10	58.3%	—	1,862	0	6	1970	4–5	44.4%	—	1,577	0	0
23	1977	25–22	53.2%	—	1,875	0	7	1971	10–10	50.0%	—	1,592	0	0
24	1978	15–14	51.7%	—	1,831	0	7	1972	24–12	66.7%	—	1,832	0	2
25	1979	12–21	36.4%	—	1,680	0	7	1973	16–14	53.3%	—	1,814	0	2
26	1980	12–8	60.0%	—	1,643	0	8	1974	19–17	52.8%	—	1,779	0	3
27	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1975	19–14	57.6%	—	1,838	0	3
28	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1976	10–9	52.6%	—	1,765	0	3
29	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1977	26–14	65.0%	—	1,819	0	5
30	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1978	6–16	27.3%	—	1,690	0	5
31	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1979	3–4	42.9%	—	1,652	0	5
32	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1980	22–10	68.8%	—	1,710	0	6
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1981	3–5	37.5%	—	1,672	0	7
34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1982	3–1	75.0%	—	1,679	0	7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Janet Newberry																	Katja Ebbinghaus
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
14	1968	7	5	12	58.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
15	1969	12	4	16	75.0%	—	—	—	—	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1970	15	3	18	83.3%	2	1	3	66.7%	3	3	6	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1971	2	2	4	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	12	6	18	66.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1972	6	4	10	60.0%	6	6	12	50.0%	6	6	12	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1973	6	5	11	54.5%	10	5	15	66.7%	8	5	13	61.5%	8	9	17	47.1%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1974	4	5	9	44.4%	1	4	5	20.0%	8	4	12	66.7%	9	9	18	50.0%	1968	—	—	—	—	2	4	6	33.3%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%
21	1975	7	5	12	58.3%	20	9	29	69.0%	3	2	5	60.0%	1	6	7	14.3%	1969	—	—	—	—	7	8	15	46.7%	—	—	—	—	3	1	4	75.0%
22	1976	1	2	3	33.3%	9	4	13	69.2%	2	2	4	50.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	1970	—	—	—	—	4	4	8	50.0%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
23	1977	4	4	8	50.0%	13	7	20	65.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	5	8	13	38.5%	1971	—	—	—	—	7	8	15	46.7%	3	2	5	60.0%	—	—	—	—
24	1978	1	2	3	33.3%	7	5	12	58.3%	5	3	8	62.5%	2	4	6	33.3%	1972	2	1	3	66.7%	21	9	30	70.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—
25	1979	2	4	6	33.3%	2	5	7	28.6%	5	5	10	50.0%	1	5	6	16.7%	1973	2	1	3	66.7%	9	7	16	56.3%	0	2	2	0.0%	3	3	6	50.0%
26	1980	6	5	11	54.5%	1	1	2	50.0%	4	0	4	100.0%	—	—	—	—	1974	0	3	3	0.0%	14	8	22	63.6%	2	1	3	66.7%	1	4	5	20.0%
27	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1975	0	1	1	0.0%	15	10	25	60.0%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
28	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1976	0	1	1	0.0%	9	6	15	60.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—
29	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1977	0	2	2	0.0%	20	9	29	69.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	3	0	3	100.0%
30	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1978	0	2	2	0.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	1	6	7	14.3%	2	5	7	28.6%
31	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1979	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	2	1	3	66.7%
32	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1980	—	—	—	—	15	9	24	62.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1981	—	—	—	—	3	1	4	75.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1982	—	—	—	—	3	1	4	75.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	73	50	123	59.3%	72	48	120	60.0%	60	41	101	59.4%	28	43	71	39.4%	—	4	11	15	26.7%	132	88	220	60.0%	11	19	30	36.7%	15	17	32	46.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Janet Newberry																Katja Ebbinghaus
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
14	1968	1542	104.3	—	—	—	—	+45	—	—	55.6%	+0.41	2–1 (67%)	—	—	+0.69	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
15	1969	1632	120.1	—	—	—	—	+106	—	-86	67.4%	+1.19	2–3 (40%)	—	—	+1.11	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1970	1719	128.8	—	—	—	—	+177	-163	-147	70.0%	+1.70	4–4 (50%)	0–1	—	+3.95	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1971	1758	132.0	—	—	—	—	+111	—	-30	56.9%	+0.65	4–1 (80%)	—	—	+0.89	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1972	1707	131.6	—	—	—	—	+164	-98	-1	54.3%	+0.39	5–4 (56%)	0–2	—	-0.95	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1973	1852	140.9	—	—	—	—	-29	-44	-119	55.8%	+0.08	11–8 (58%)	7–1 (88%)	106.5	-4.59	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1974	1813	140.5	—	—	—	—	-4	-63	-20	50.5%	+0.13	4–5 (44%)	5–5 (50%)	99.4	-2.47	1968	1494	106.8	—	—	—	—	—	-1	—	47.8%	-0.30	0–3 (0%)	—	—	-0.04
21	1975	1904	152.7	—	—	—	—	-63	+15	-117	57.6%	+0.47	6–6 (50%)	6–1 (86%)	104.5	-5.60	1969	1559	120.0	—	—	—	—	+58	-14	—	53.5%	+0.37	2–3 (40%)	—	—	+0.60
22	1976	1863	123.7	—	—	—	—	-83	+57	-40	51.8%	-0.23	7–1 (88%)	3–1 (75%)	107.1	-1.77	1970	1577	112.4	—	—	—	—	—	+12	—	42.9%	-0.48	2–1 (67%)	—	—	+0.41
23	1977	1875	146.0	—	—	—	—	-74	+55	-101	52.8%	+0.28	6–6 (50%)	2–5 (29%)	95.9	-3.22	1971	1593	120.8	—	—	—	—	—	-4	-15	54.3%	+0.37	1–7 (13%)	—	—	+1.77
24	1978	1831	138.7	—	—	—	—	-69	+30	+11	50.7%	+0.12	5–4 (56%)	0–4 (0%)	95.6	-2.30	1972	1832	145.6	—	—	—	—	-229	+82	-272	65.5%	+0.91	5–7 (42%)	0–2	—	-2.05
25	1979	1681	129.3	—	—	—	—	+2	+125	+112	39.1%	-0.90	2–3 (40%)	4–4 (50%)	97.3	+0.41	1973	1815	136.7	—	—	—	—	-146	+69	—	54.9%	+0.10	4–7 (36%)	2–0	—	-2.33
26	1980	1644	112.8	—	—	—	—	-10	—	+207	60.0%	+0.76	4–3 (57%)	1–1	—	+2.97	1974	1780	126.8	—	—	—	—	-223	+72	-178	56.0%	+0.31	3–4 (43%)	6–3 (67%)	99.3	-0.63
27	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1975	1839	139.4	—	—	—	—	—	+58	—	56.0%	+0.24	7–4 (64%)	4–2 (67%)	103.7	-1.26
28	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1976	1765	129.1	—	—	—	—	—	+92	-152	51.2%	+0.30	3–2 (60%)	2–1 (67%)	101.2	+0.17
29	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1977	1820	138.1	—	—	—	—	-237	+104	-212	60.2%	+0.77	9–4 (69%)	1–4 (20%)	101.2	+0.76
30	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1978	1690	126.2	—	—	—	—	-129	+163	-112	33.3%	-1.17	4–6 (40%)	3–1 (75%)	99.8	-1.71
31	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1979	1653	108.5	—	—	—	—	-66	—	—	43.8%	-0.63	1–1	1–0	—	+1.23
32	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1980	1711	128.6	—	—	—	—	—	+76	—	62.3%	+1.20	6–3 (67%)	1–4 (20%)	98.0	+1.51
33	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1981	1673	109.0	—	—	—	—	—	+131	—	53.8%	+0.69	0–1	0–3 (0%)	—	+1.16
34	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1982	1680	106.2	—	—	—	—	—	+114	—	75.0%	+1.50	—	—	—	+0.69
Career	—	1922	142.9	—	—	—	—	+13	+8	-28	54.9%	+0.32	62–49 (56%)	28–25 (53%)	101.7	-2.59	—	1878	138.4	—	—	—	—	-149	+67	-146	55.2%	+0.35	47–53 (47%)	20–20 (50%)	97.1	+0.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Janet Newberry's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Mima Jausovec	3	6	9	May 27, 1978	H2H
Rosie Casals	0	9	9	Feb 3, 1978	H2H
Laura Dupont	5	4	9	Feb 2, 1978	H2H
Chris Evert	0	8	8	May 11, 1979	H2H
Kerry Reid	1	7	8	Feb 23, 1978	H2H

Katja Ebbinghaus's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Helga Masthoff	2	10	12	Jul 11, 1976	H2H
Iris Riedel Kuhn	2	5	7	Jul 5, 1981	H2H
Raquel Giscafre	3	3	6	Jul 19, 1975	H2H
Kora Schediwy	5	0	5	Jul 10, 1976	H2H
Gail Sherriff	2	3	5	Apr 16, 1976	H2H