H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Kay Mcdaniel H2H: 0-1
Kay Mcdaniel holds a 1–0 lead over Janet Newberry in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kay Mcdaniel leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kay Mcdaniel won the 1979 Dallas second round 7-5 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1979* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R64 | Carpet | Kay Mcdaniel | 7-5 7-6 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Kay Mcdaniel | — | — | — | 1,653 | 18 | 40 | 31.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Kay Mcdaniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |