H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Kristien Shaw H2H: 2-3
Kristien Shaw holds a 3–2 lead over Janet Newberry in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kristien Shaw won the 1977 Houston third round 6-0 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
Age 73
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1977* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kristien Shaw | 6-0 7-6 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| Oct 5, 1973* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kristien Shaw | 6-2 6-4 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| Aug 24, 1973* | Newport | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Kristien Shaw | 6-3 6-1 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1971* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Janet Newberry | 6-2 6-1 | Kristien Shaw | Match data |
| May 10, 1970* | Los Angeles Socal Chps | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Janet Newberry | 6-3 6-3 | Kristien Shaw | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Kristien Shaw | — | — | — | 1,929 | 119 | 141 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Kristien Shaw | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 12–10 | 54.5% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 23–25 | 47.9% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 2–13 | 13.3% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 29–24 | 54.7% | — | 1,913 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,802 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,834 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |