H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Linda Tuero H2H: 0-1
Linda Tuero holds a 1–0 lead over Janet Newberry in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Linda Tuero leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Linda Tuero won the 1969 Chestnut Hill second round 6-0 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 75
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 1969* | Chestnut Hill | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Linda Tuero | 6-0 3-6 6-2 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Linda Tuero | — | — | — | 1,972 | 175 | 78 | 69.2% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Linda Tuero | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | 1968 | 29–10 | 74.4% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 22–6 | 78.6% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 9 |
| 20 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 45–15 | 75.0% | — | 1,880 | 0 | 13 |
| 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 23–17 | 57.5% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 13 |
| 23 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 13 |