H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Marcie Louie H2H: 2-2
Janet Newberry and Marcie Louie are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Janet Newberry leads 2–1 on clay, while Marcie Louie leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Marcie Louie won the 1975 Detroit fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
Age 72
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 1975* | Detroit | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Marcie Louie | 6-3 6-4 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| Aug 9, 1973* | Nashville | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Janet Newberry | 6-4 7-6(4) | Marcie Louie | Match data |
| Mar 19, 1973* | Richmond | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Janet Newberry | 6-3 6-3 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
| Sep 15, 1972* | Charlotte | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Marcie Louie | 6-4 6-1 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Marcie Louie | — | — | — | 1,867 | 103 | 141 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Marcie Louie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |