H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Maria Teresa Nasuelli H2H: 2-0
Janet Newberry holds a 2–0 lead over Maria Teresa Nasuelli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Janet Newberry leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janet Newberry won the 1975 Philadelphia third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 1975* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Janet Newberry | 6-2 6-3 | Maria Teresa Nasuelli | Match data |
| Aug 21, 1974* | Newport | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Janet Newberry | 6-2 6-3 | Maria Teresa Nasuelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Maria Teresa Nasuelli | — | — | — | 1,622 | 66 | 98 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Janet Newberry | Maria Teresa Nasuelli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 2 |
| 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 2 |
| 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 2 |
| 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 3 |
| 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 3 |
| 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 3 |
| 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 7–11 | 38.9% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |
| 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |
| 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 3 |
| 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 3 |
| 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | 1980 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 3 |