H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Marie Pinterova H2H: 3-1
Janet Newberry holds a 3–1 lead over Marie Pinterova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Janet Newberry leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marie Pinterova won the 1979 Berlin third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 1979* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Marie Pinterova | 6-3 6-2 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| May 21, 1977* | Rome | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | Janet Newberry | 2-6 6-4 6-1 | Marie Pinterova | Match data |
| May 29, 1975* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Janet Newberry | 6-4 6-3 | Marie Pinterova | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1972* | Tucson | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Janet Newberry | 6-2 6-1 | Marie Pinterova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Marie Pinterova | — | — | — | 1,782 | 136 | 147 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Marie Pinterova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | 1968 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | 1971 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | 1973 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 12 |