H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Marijke Jansen H2H: 1-1
Janet Newberry and Marijke Jansen are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marijke Jansen leads 1–0 on clay, while Janet Newberry leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Janet Newberry won the 1975 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 81
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1975* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Janet Newberry | 6-2 6-1 | Marijke Jansen | Match data |
| Jul 22, 1972* | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Marijke Jansen | 6-3 6-0 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Marijke Jansen | — | — | — | 1,817 | 94 | 73 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Marijke Jansen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1968 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | 1969 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | 1970 | 18–8 | 69.2% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | 1971 | 16–10 | 61.5% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 4 |