H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Marjorie Gengler H2H: 2-1
Janet Newberry holds a 2–1 lead over Marjorie Gengler in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Janet Newberry leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Janet Newberry won the 1970 Greenville fourth round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1970* | Greenville | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Janet Newberry | 6-0 6-3 | Marjorie Gengler | Match data |
| May 9, 1969* | Los Angeles Socal Chps | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Janet Newberry | 6-4 7-5 | Marjorie Gengler | Match data |
| Feb 4, 1968* | San Diego | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Marjorie Gengler | 6-2 6-2 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Marjorie Gengler | — | — | — | 1,593 | 25 | 31 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Janet Newberry | Marjorie Gengler | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 2 |
| 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 3 |
| 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 3 |
| 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 3 |
| 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 3 |
| 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 3 |
| 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 3 |
| 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |