H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Janet Newberry vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 3-6

Mima Jausovec holds a 6–3 lead over Janet Newberry in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 3–1 on clay and 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Janet Newberry won the 1978 Italian Open quarterfinal 3-6 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Janet Newberry
USA Age 73 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 6
9 main-draw meetings
Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Janet Newberry 3-6 6-2 7-5 Mima Jausovec Match data May 27, 1978* QF Italian Open WTA 250 Clay
Mima Jausovec 6-1 6-2 Janet Newberry Match data Sep 6, 1977* R32 US Open Grand Slam Clay
Mima Jausovec 6-3 6-3 Janet Newberry Match data Mar 4, 1977* R16 San Francisco WTA 250 Carpet
Janet Newberry 4-6 7-5 6-2 Mima Jausovec Match data Jan 6, 1977* R32 Washington Open WTA 500 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-2 6-2 Janet Newberry Match data Aug 20, 1976* R16 Canadian Open WTA 250 Clay
Mima Jausovec 3-6 6-0 6-3 Janet Newberry Match data May 30, 1975* R16 Italian Open WTA 250 Clay
Mima Jausovec 6-3 1-6 6-1 Janet Newberry Match data Feb 7, 1975* R16 Akron WTA 250 Hard
Janet Newberry 6-1 5-7 6-1 Mima Jausovec Match data Jan 27, 1975 R32 Washington Open WTA 250 Hard
Mima Jausovec 6-2 6-3 Janet Newberry Match data Nov 17, 1974* QF London WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Janet Newberry — — — 1,922 238 187 56.0% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Janet Newberry Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1968 7–5 58.3% — 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1969 13–6 68.4% — 1,631 0 2 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1
16 1970 20–7 74.1% — 1,718 0 5 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
17 1971 15–9 62.5% — 1,757 0 5 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1
18 1972 20–17 54.1% — 1,707 0 5 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1
19 1973 32–24 57.1% — 1,851 0 5 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,004 0 4
20 1974 22–22 50.0% — 1,812 0 5 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5
21 1975 31–22 58.5% — 1,903 0 6 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6
22 1976 14–10 58.3% — 1,862 0 6 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,870 1 6
23 1977 25–22 53.2% — 1,875 0 7 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,945 1 6
24 1978 15–14 51.7% — 1,831 0 7 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,013 1 6
25 1979 12–21 36.4% — 1,680 0 7 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,857 1 7
26 1980 12–8 60.0% — 1,643 0 8 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7
27 — — — — — — — 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7
28 — — — — — — — 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7
29 — — — — — — — 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 — — — — — — — 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 — — — — — — — 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Janet Newberry Mima Jausovec
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1968 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1969 12 4 16 75.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1970 15 3 18 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 1971 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 12 6 18 66.7% — — — — 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
18 1972 6 4 10 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2%
19 1973 6 5 11 54.5% 10 5 15 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 8 9 17 47.1% 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
20 1974 4 5 9 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 9 9 18 50.0% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6%
21 1975 7 5 12 58.3% 20 9 29 69.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8%
22 1976 1 2 3 33.3% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2%
23 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2%
24 1978 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7%
25 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7%
26 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 0 4 100.0% — — — — 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 50 123 59.3% 72 48 120 60.0% 60 41 101 59.4% 28 43 71 39.4% — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Janet Newberry Mima Jausovec
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1968 1542 104.3 — — — — +45 — — 55.6% +0.41 2–1 (67%) — — +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1969 1632 120.1 — — — — +106 — -86 67.4% +1.19 2–3 (40%) — — +1.11 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55
16 1970 1719 128.8 — — — — +177 -163 -147 70.0% +1.70 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — +3.95 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.21
17 1971 1758 132.0 — — — — +111 — -30 56.9% +0.65 4–1 (80%) — — +0.89 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90
18 1972 1707 131.6 — — — — +164 -98 -1 54.3% +0.39 5–4 (56%) 0–2 — -0.95 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97
19 1973 1852 140.9 — — — — -29 -44 -119 55.8% +0.08 11–8 (58%) 7–1 (88%) 106.5 -4.59 1976 2004 156.6 — — — — -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78
20 1974 1813 140.5 — — — — -4 -63 -20 50.5% +0.13 4–5 (44%) 5–5 (50%) 99.4 -2.47 1977 2011 161.6 — — — — -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51
21 1975 1904 152.7 — — — — -63 +15 -117 57.6% +0.47 6–6 (50%) 6–1 (86%) 104.5 -5.60 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80
22 1976 1863 123.7 — — — — -83 +57 -40 51.8% -0.23 7–1 (88%) 3–1 (75%) 107.1 -1.77 1979 1871 146.4 — — — — -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84
23 1977 1875 146.0 — — — — -74 +55 -101 52.8% +0.28 6–6 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 95.9 -3.22 1980 1945 155.9 — — — — +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63
24 1978 1831 138.7 — — — — -69 +30 +11 50.7% +0.12 5–4 (56%) 0–4 (0%) 95.6 -2.30 1981 2013 157.1 — — — — 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76
25 1979 1681 129.3 — — — — +2 +125 +112 39.1% -0.90 2–3 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 97.3 +0.41 1982 1858 148.5 — — — — +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56
26 1980 1644 112.8 — — — — -10 — +207 60.0% +0.76 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — +2.97 1983 1874 143.9 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1748 131.7 — — — — -27 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1695 127.6 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1673 105.7 — — — — — +197 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1656 107.2 — — — — — +179 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.33
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1641 110.1 — — — — — +162 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77
Career — 1922 142.9 — — — — +13 +8 -28 54.9% +0.32 62–49 (56%) 28–25 (53%) 101.7 -2.59 — 2091 156.0 — — — — -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.