H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Janet Newberry vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 3-6

Mima Jausovec holds a 6–3 lead over Janet Newberry in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 3–1 on clay and 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Janet Newberry won the 1978 Rome quarterfinal 3-6 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Janet Newberry
USA Age 72 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 6
9 main draw meetings
Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 69 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 27, 1978* Rome WTA 1000 QF Clay Janet Newberry 3-6 6-2 7-5 Mima Jausovec Match data
Sep 6, 1977* US Open Grand Slam R32 Clay Mima Jausovec 6-1 6-2 Janet Newberry Match data
Mar 4, 1977* San Francisco WTA 250 R16 Carpet Mima Jausovec 6-3 6-3 Janet Newberry Match data
Jan 6, 1977* Washington DC WTA 500 R32 Carpet Janet Newberry 4-6 7-5 6-2 Mima Jausovec Match data
Aug 16, 1976 Toronto WTA 250 R16 Clay Mima Jausovec 6-2 6-2 Janet Newberry Match data
May 30, 1975* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Mima Jausovec 3-6 6-0 6-3 Janet Newberry Match data
Feb 7, 1975* Akron WTA 250 R16 Hard Mima Jausovec 6-3 1-6 6-1 Janet Newberry Match data
Jan 27, 1975 Washington WTA 250 R32 Hard Janet Newberry 6-1 5-7 6-1 Mima Jausovec Match data
Nov 17, 1974* London WTA 250 QF Carpet Mima Jausovec 6-2 6-3 Janet Newberry Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Janet Newberry — — — 1,919 238 187 56.0% 0 1 0 1 6 8
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,088 339 246 57.9% 1 1 0 1 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Janet Newberry Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1968 7–5 58.3% — 1,541 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1969 13–6 68.4% — 1,645 0 2 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1
16 1970 20–7 74.1% — 1,726 0 5 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
17 1971 15–9 62.5% — 1,765 0 5 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,790 0 1
18 1972 20–17 54.1% — 1,707 0 5 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,804 0 1
19 1973 32–24 57.1% — 1,851 0 5 1976 33–16 67.3% — 1,996 0 4
20 1974 22–22 50.0% — 1,810 0 5 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,008 1 5
21 1975 31–22 58.5% — 1,899 0 6 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,922 1 6
22 1976 14–10 58.3% — 1,859 0 6 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,866 1 6
23 1977 25–22 53.2% — 1,873 0 7 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,941 1 6
24 1978 15–14 51.7% — 1,831 0 7 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,010 1 6
25 1979 12–21 36.4% — 1,679 0 7 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,861 1 7
26 1980 12–8 60.0% — 1,631 0 8 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7
27 — — — — — — — 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7
28 — — — — — — — 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7
29 — — — — — — — 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 — — — — — — — 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 — — — — — — — 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7