H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Renata Tomanova H2H: 4-0
Janet Newberry holds a 4–0 lead over Renata Tomanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Janet Newberry leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Janet Newberry won the 1977 US Open second round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
Age 71
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1977* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Janet Newberry | 6-4 7-6 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1977* | Edinburgh | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Janet Newberry | 6-1 6-0 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| May 22, 1977* | Rome | WTA 1000 | F | Clay | Janet Newberry | 6-3 7-6(7) | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1976 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Janet Newberry | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Renata Tomanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 |