H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Tory Ann Fretz H2H: 0-1
Tory Ann Fretz holds a 1–0 lead over Janet Newberry in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tory Ann Fretz leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tory Ann Fretz won the 1968 Los Angeles Socal Chps semifinal 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 83
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1968* | Los Angeles Socal Chps | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Tory Ann Fretz | 6-2 6-3 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Tory Ann Fretz | — | — | — | 1,802 | 104 | 102 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Tory Ann Fretz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | 1968 | 28–14 | 66.7% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 10–20 | 33.3% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |