H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Valerie Ziegenfuss H2H: 3-1
Janet Newberry holds a 3–1 lead over Valerie Ziegenfuss in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Janet Newberry leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Janet Newberry won the 1977 San Francisco third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
Age 77
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 1977* | San Francisco | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Janet Newberry | 6-3 6-3 | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Match data |
| Jan 24, 1974* | Mission Viejo | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Valerie Ziegenfuss | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| May 11, 1969* | Los Angeles Socal Chps | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Janet Newberry | 6-2 6-4 | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Match data |
| Oct 8, 1968* | La Jolla Nationals | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Janet Newberry | 6-1 7-5 | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Valerie Ziegenfuss | — | — | — | 1,952 | 231 | 232 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Valerie Ziegenfuss | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 40–28 | 58.8% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 23–29 | 44.2% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 33–29 | 53.2% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | 1975 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 3 |