H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Janet Newberry vs Virginia Ruzici H2H: 2-2
Janet Newberry and Virginia Ruzici are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Virginia Ruzici leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Virginia Ruzici won the 1977 Oldsmar fourth round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 71
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1977* | Oldsmar | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Virginia Ruzici | 6-3 6-0 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1977* | Detroit | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Virginia Ruzici | 1-6 6-4 6-4 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| Nov 16, 1974* | London | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Janet Newberry | 6-4 7-6 | Virginia Ruzici | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1974* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Janet Newberry | 6-0 6-1 | Virginia Ruzici | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Virginia Ruzici | #264 | #16 | 5 | 2,121 | 458 | 274 | 62.6% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Newberry | Virginia Ruzici | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 30–20 | 60.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,918 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 59–26 | 69.4% | — | 2,093 | 1 | 8 |
| 24 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 | 1979 | 52–27 | 65.8% | — | 1,966 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 73–26 | 73.7% | — | 2,027 | 1 | 12 |
| 26 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 | 1981 | 61–30 | 67.0% | — | 1,920 | 1 | 14 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,982 | 1 | 18 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,905 | 1 | 19 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #44 | 1,780 | 1 | 19 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #48 | 1,786 | 1 | 20 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,734 | 1 | 20 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #143 | 1,658 | 1 | 20 |