H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Janet Young vs Monique Van Haver H2H: 3-0
Janet Young holds a 3–0 lead over Monique Van Haver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Janet Young leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Janet Young won the 1973 Auckland fourth round 7-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 1973* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Janet Young | 7-6 6-0 | Monique Van Haver | Match data |
| Jan 5, 1973* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Janet Young | 3-6 7-5 8-6 | Monique Van Haver | Match data |
| Nov 25, 1972* | Melbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Janet Young | 6-3 1-6 7-5 | Monique Van Haver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Young | — | — | — | 1,805 | 83 | 86 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Monique Van Haver | — | — | — | 1,598 | 30 | 38 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Young | Monique Van Haver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 17–27 | 38.6% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1972 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1973 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 8–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1974 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 4 |