H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Janet Young vs Peggy Michel H2H: 1-3
Peggy Michel holds a 3–1 lead over Janet Young in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Peggy Michel leads 3–0 on grass. Most recently, Peggy Michel won the 1975 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1975* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Peggy Michel | 6-1 6-0 | Janet Young | Match data |
| Apr 20, 1974* | Dallas Aztec | WTA 250 | QF | — | Janet Young | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Peggy Michel | Match data |
| Jan 5, 1974* | New South Wales | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Peggy Michel | 6-2 6-2 | Janet Young | Match data |
| Jul 31, 1969* | Orange | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Peggy Michel | 6-3 6-2 | Janet Young | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Young | — | — | — | 1,805 | 83 | 86 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Peggy Michel | — | — | — | 1,719 | 70 | 78 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Young | Peggy Michel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 17–27 | 38.6% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1972 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1973 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 16–17 | 48.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 14–17 | 45.2% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |