H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Janette Husarova vs Jana Nejedly H2H: 1-0
Janette Husarova holds a 1–0 lead over Jana Nejedly in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Janette Husarova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janette Husarova won the 2001 Indian Wells first round 5-7 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2001* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Janette Husarova | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | Jana Nejedly | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janette Husarova | #1,055 | #31 | 1,006 | 1,737 | 79 | 109 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jana Nejedly | #914 | #64 | 488 | 1,626 | 49 | 104 | 32.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janette Husarova | Jana Nejedly | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1993 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #82 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #328 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #145 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #82 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #130 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #375 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #127 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #75 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #88 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #69 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #96 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #233 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #126 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #366 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |