H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Janice Metcalf vs Marita Redondo H2H: 0-2
Marita Redondo holds a 2–0 lead over Janice Metcalf in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marita Redondo leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marita Redondo won the 1972 Los Angeles Pac Southwest final 6-3 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 1972* | Los Angeles Pac Southwest | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Marita Redondo | 6-3 5-7 6-2 | Janice Metcalf | Match data |
| Aug 19, 1972* | Wilmington | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Marita Redondo | 6-2 6-2 | Janice Metcalf | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janice Metcalf | — | — | — | 1,805 | 58 | 41 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Marita Redondo | — | — | — | 1,905 | 136 | 118 | 53.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janice Metcalf | Marita Redondo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 24–4 | 85.7% | — | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 17 | 1970 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 29–16 | 64.4% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 18 | 1971 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1972 | 23–7 | 76.7% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1973 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 16–17 | 48.5% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1975 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 19–17 | 52.8% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1976 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 8 |