H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Janice Tjen vs Mia Pohankova H2H: 1-0

Janice Tjen holds a 1–0 lead over Mia Pohankova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Janice Tjen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janice Tjen won the 2025 Chennai Open quarterfinal 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Janice Tjen
Indonesia Age 24 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Mia Pohankova
Slovak Republic Age 18 N/A

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Janice Tjen #82 6-3 6-1 Mia Pohankova Match data Oct 31, 2025 QF Chennai Open WTA 250 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Janice Tjen #47 #35 1,341 1,792 26 31 45.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mia Pohankova #144 #144 504 1,707 8 3 72.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Janice Tjen Mia Pohankova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2025 2–1 66.7% — 1,525 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2026 6–2 75.0% #144 1,707 0 0
23 2025 10–3 76.9% #56 1,760 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2026 16–28 36.4% #47 1,702 0 1 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Janice Tjen Mia Pohankova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1526 106.7 — — — — +28 — — 66.7% +0.67 — — — +0.27
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1707 123.3 +1.37 +0.65 1.094 52.5% +38 — — 70.6% +1.06 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.17
23 2025 1760 132.2 +2.30 -0.55 1.147 52.4% +37 — — 70.0% +1.13 3–1 (75%) 4–1 (80%) 105.2 +1.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2026 1703 138.9 +0.80 -3.68 0.908 48.0% +32 -187 -111 40.0% -0.75 4–8 (33%) 10–8 (56%) 99.0 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1792 136.7 +1.04 -3.17 0.943 48.7% +33 -187 -111 46.9% -0.32 7–9 (44%) 14–9 (61%) 103.1 +1.32 — 1707 116.8 +1.37 +0.65 1.094 52.5% +35 — — 69.6% +0.96 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +4.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.