H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jarmila Wolfe vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 1-1
Jarmila Wolfe and Anna-Lena Groenefeld are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2010 Istanbul third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2010* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jarmila Wolfe | 6-2 6-1 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2005* | Hyderabad | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-3 6-2 | Jarmila Wolfe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarmila Wolfe | #623 | #25 | 2,060 | 1,799 | 104 | 137 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jarmila Wolfe | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #195 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #42 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #183 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #238 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |