H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jarmila Wolfe vs Laura Pous-Tio H2H: 0-1

Laura Pous-Tio holds a 1–0 lead over Jarmila Wolfe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Pous-Tio leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Pous-Tio won the 2010 Morocco Open first round 6-0 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarmila Wolfe
Australia Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Laura Pous-Tio
Spain Age 41 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Pous-Tio #192 6-0 7-6(4) Jarmila Wolfe #100 Match data Apr 28, 2010* R32 Morocco Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,800 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Laura Pous-Tio #776 #72 930 1,620 41 62 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Laura Pous-Tio
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,537 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0 2005 7–7 50.0% #90 1,542 0 0
21 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,504 0 0 2006 6–14 30.0% #101 1,497 0 0
22 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0 2007 3–6 33.3% #165 1,465 0 0
23 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,688 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,697 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,510 0 2 2010 6–6 50.0% #108 1,529 0 0
26 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2 2011 13–15 46.4% #75 1,589 0 0
27 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,553 0 2 2012 6–9 40.0% #157 1,545 0 0
28 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,479 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #194 1,531 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2016 0–4 0.0% #287 1,427 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Laura Pous-Tio
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2003 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 2 10 12 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — —
21 2008 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2009 2 8 10 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
23 2010 10 7 17 58.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2013 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2015 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 65 89 154 42.2% 27 29 56 48.2% 12 18 30 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 4 19 23 17.4% 37 40 77 48.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 42/47 of Jarmila Wolfe's and 71/89 of Laura Pous-Tio's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Laura Pous-Tio
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 12/20 1.1 3.2 65.7% 58.4% 48.6% 56.2% 41.7% 55.0% 43.2%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 6/9 1.3 5.2 58.3% 53.0% 43.7% 48.0% 63.9% 49.2% 46.9%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 7/12 0.6 2.1 71.6% 57.1% 53.3% 52.3% 57.3% 55.3% 46.4%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 27/28 0.7 2.5 67.4% 55.1% 47.8% 54.8% 53.1% 52.8% 46.5%
27 2014 15/16 5.6 3.9 58.1% 67.2% 45.9% 47.1% 47.4% 57.9% 40.9% 2012 14/15 0.6 3.1 59.3% 61.5% 43.4% 55.3% 52.5% 54.0% 47.9%
28 2015 25/29 4.2 3.7 59.2% 65.8% 47.6% 45.6% 40.9% 58.3% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 2/2 6.0 5.5 58.3% 61.4% 31.9% 50.0% 29.2% 49.2% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 0.0 2.0 64.4% 51.1% 61.5% 37.5% 50.0% 54.8% 34.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 4/4 0.8 4.8 67.6% 54.9% 33.7% 40.6% 78.6% 48.2% 41.7%
Career — 42/241 4.8 3.9 58.8% 66.1% 46.3% 46.4% 42.7% 57.7% 39.2% — 71/103 0.8 3.0 65.1% 56.9% 46.7% 53.3% 53.8% 53.1% 45.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Laura Pous-Tio
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2003 1532 109.1 — — — — — +33 — 66.7% +1.17 — — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 1515 97.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 1538 107.7 — — — — -8 — — 50.0% -0.63 — 1–0 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1533 102.2 — — — — 0 +11 +27 40.9% -0.55 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 +1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 1475 97.8 — — — — -41 +56 — 35.6% -0.98 1–4 (20%) 0–2 — +0.59 2005 1542 107.3 — — — — -41 +77 — 46.9% -0.56 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — -0.14
21 2008 1505 117.9 — — — — -2 — — 35.0% -1.15 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.54 2006 1498 111.5 -0.72 -1.49 0.959 49.2% -43 +76 — 36.2% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 0–1 — -0.11
22 2009 1563 119.3 — — — — -98 +18 +22 43.4% -0.75 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 -0.65 2007 1466 95.5 -3.89 -0.40 0.924 48.0% — +65 — 35.0% -0.80 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.71
23 2010 1689 133.8 — — — — -92 -65 -29 61.4% +1.03 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 +1.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 1698 138.0 — — — — -35 -1 -32 55.3% +0.24 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 101.3 -1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 1510 111.2 — — — — +23 +130 — 33.3% -1.22 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 93.6 +0.36 2010 1530 117.0 -0.15 +1.25 1.039 51.0% — +51 — 53.3% +0.13 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.42
26 2013 1535 111.3 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.14 1–1 — — +0.26 2011 1590 119.1 -2.29 +2.09 0.985 49.8% -126 +36 — 44.3% 0.00 4–3 (57%) 2–6 (25%) 100.5 -0.55
27 2014 1554 120.0 +0.80 -1.14 0.972 49.3% +14 — — 47.4% -0.03 2–6 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +0.49 2012 1545 107.7 -1.22 -0.13 1.041 51.1% -104 +94 — 40.6% -0.56 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.78
28 2015 1537 122.3 +0.24 -2.00 0.920 48.3% +41 +43 +60 44.1% -0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.9 -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 1480 93.6 -1.39 +0.21 0.729 43.2% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1531 100.6 -1.68 -0.81 0.759 45.0% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.03
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1428 94.0 -2.86 -3.40 0.805 45.3% -10 — — 11.1% -2.22 0–1 — — +0.53
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1414 96.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1801 126.0 +0.36 -1.59 0.927 48.4% -18 +22 +9 46.4% -0.29 25–50 (33%) 27–30 (47%) 92.4 +0.91 — 1621 111.6 -1.76 +0.40 0.977 49.6% -75 +62 — 41.2% -0.42 13–20 (39%) 8–15 (35%) 91.7 +0.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.