H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jarmila Wolfe vs Melinda Czink H2H: 1-0
Jarmila Wolfe holds a 1–0 lead over Melinda Czink in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jarmila Wolfe leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2007 Fes third round 6-3 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 43
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2007* | Fes | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Jarmila Wolfe | 6-3 4-6 6-1 | Melinda Czink | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarmila Wolfe | #623 | #25 | 2,060 | 1,799 | 104 | 137 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Melinda Czink | #691 | #37 | 1,571 | 1,794 | 89 | 136 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarmila Wolfe | Melinda Czink | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #195 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #128 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #42 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #105 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #183 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #106 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #238 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #94 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #254 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |