H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jarmila Wolfe vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 0-4

Nadia Petrova holds a 4–0 lead over Jarmila Wolfe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2012 US Open round of 128 6-3 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarmila Wolfe
Australia Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main-draw meetings
Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nadia Petrova #22 6-3 7-6(3) Jarmila Wolfe #99 Match data Aug 29, 2012* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Nadia Petrova #35 7-6(2) 0-0 (ret.) Jarmila Wolfe #55 Match data May 4, 2012* R16 Estoril International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Nadia Petrova #28 6-1 6-2 Jarmila Wolfe #29 Match data Aug 10, 2011* R64 Canadian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Nadia Petrova #19 6-3 6-2 Jarmila Wolfe #41 Match data Sep 23, 2010* R32 Korea Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,800 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,089 444 278 61.5% 0 3 1 5 4 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,567 0 0
18 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,537 0 0 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,745 0 0
21 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,504 0 0 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,921 0 0
22 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0 2004 40–25 61.5% #12 1,879 0 0
23 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,688 0 1 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,971 0 1
24 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,697 0 2 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,999 0 6
25 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,510 0 2 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,918 0 7
26 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,925 0 9
27 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,553 0 2 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,824 0 9
28 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,852 0 9
29 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,479 0 2 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,786 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 2012 39–19 67.2% #12 1,933 0 13
31 — — — — — — — 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,725 0 13
32 — — — — — — — 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,656 0 13

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Nadia Petrova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2003 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2006 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2007 2 10 12 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2002 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2008 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 20 11 31 64.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2009 2 8 10 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2004 28 16 44 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2010 10 7 17 58.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2005 34 17 51 66.7% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 28 16 44 63.6% 15 1 16 93.8% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
25 2012 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 20 11 31 64.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 0 4 100.0%
26 2013 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 34 17 51 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2015 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 20 11 31 64.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 65 89 154 42.2% 27 29 56 48.2% 12 18 30 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 264 170 434 60.8% 107 62 169 63.3% 51 28 79 64.6% 22 18 40 55.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 42/47 of Jarmila Wolfe's and 414/630 of Nadia Petrova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Nadia Petrova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 12/56 3.7 3.3 56.6% 70.3% 47.3% 61.6% 49.4% 60.0% 51.0%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 10/65 4.7 4.2 56.8% 69.4% 49.1% 44.6% 40.1% 60.7% 44.9%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 22/81 3.9 3.4 60.3% 69.7% 48.9% 61.7% 50.8% 61.3% 47.2%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 50/67 5.1 2.7 61.5% 71.4% 51.1% 58.4% 48.2% 63.7% 47.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 49/55 4.4 3.1 61.8% 71.9% 48.2% 58.1% 47.0% 62.6% 45.1%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 63/71 4.7 3.7 60.3% 70.4% 44.7% 57.0% 53.9% 60.4% 45.5%
27 2014 15/16 5.6 3.9 58.1% 67.2% 45.9% 47.1% 47.4% 57.9% 40.9% 2009 47/51 6.2 3.7 58.3% 70.3% 46.5% 50.8% 44.7% 60.2% 42.2%
28 2015 25/29 4.2 3.7 59.2% 65.8% 47.6% 45.6% 40.9% 58.3% 38.4% 2010 47/52 6.2 3.3 57.1% 71.5% 48.2% 63.1% 51.9% 61.5% 43.1%
29 2016 2/2 6.0 5.5 58.3% 61.4% 31.9% 50.0% 29.2% 49.2% 37.1% 2011 41/46 4.2 3.0 58.5% 66.6% 48.1% 55.9% 52.2% 59.1% 42.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 45/58 6.0 3.0 55.3% 70.5% 46.7% 51.0% 48.8% 60.0% 44.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 22/22 6.3 3.0 60.4% 67.2% 41.1% 51.9% 43.8% 57.1% 44.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 6/6 5.3 5.5 46.7% 66.9% 45.9% 48.3% 39.9% 54.2% 42.2%
Career — 42/241 4.8 3.9 58.8% 66.1% 46.3% 46.4% 42.7% 57.7% 39.2% — 414/722 5.2 3.3 58.9% 70.2% 47.3% 56.2% 49.0% 60.8% 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Nadia Petrova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2003 1532 109.1 — — — — — +33 — 66.7% +1.17 — — — -0.09 1998 1536 108.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 2–0 1–1 — -0.21
17 2004 1515 97.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.08 1999 1568 119.8 — — — — +27 — — 38.9% -1.06 1–1 1–0 — -0.10
18 2005 1538 107.7 — — — — -8 — — 50.0% -0.63 — 1–0 — +0.03 2000 1625 137.4 — — — — +80 -140 -67 48.4% +0.27 4–8 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 -0.47
19 2006 1533 102.2 — — — — 0 +11 +27 40.9% -0.55 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 +1.14 2001 1683 138.0 — — — — -59 -20 -54 49.4% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 2–11 (15%) 96.0 -0.89
20 2007 1475 97.8 — — — — -41 +56 — 35.6% -0.98 1–4 (20%) 0–2 — +0.59 2002 1745 137.3 — — — — -48 — — 59.1% +0.68 1–1 1–1 — -1.69
21 2008 1505 117.9 — — — — -2 — — 35.0% -1.15 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.54 2003 1922 156.8 +3.29 +4.32 1.277 55.5% -51 -85 -174 61.1% +0.92 11–9 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 105.2 -2.56
22 2009 1563 119.3 — — — — -98 +18 +22 43.4% -0.75 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 -0.65 2004 1880 151.4 +3.04 +0.66 1.141 52.4% +11 -49 -143 61.4% +1.02 8–11 (42%) 7–7 (50%) 95.7 +1.78
23 2010 1689 133.8 — — — — -92 -65 -29 61.4% +1.03 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 +1.85 2005 1971 156.3 +4.70 +2.81 1.221 54.3% -26 +29 -176 69.4% +1.41 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 102.6 +1.08
24 2011 1698 138.0 — — — — -35 -1 -32 55.3% +0.24 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 101.3 -1.13 2006 1999 165.0 +7.12 +3.75 1.310 55.6% -34 +105 — 70.3% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 +2.64
25 2012 1510 111.2 — — — — +23 +130 — 33.3% -1.22 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 93.6 +0.36 2007 1918 152.6 +6.15 +2.04 1.205 53.8% +19 +124 -43 68.2% +1.44 9–3 (75%) 7–7 (50%) 101.3 -0.25
26 2013 1535 111.3 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.14 1–1 — — +0.26 2008 1926 146.0 +4.49 +1.77 1.149 53.0% -16 +1 +21 66.9% +1.29 7–11 (39%) 9–5 (64%) 94.7 +0.54
27 2014 1554 120.0 +0.80 -1.14 0.972 49.3% +14 — — 47.4% -0.03 2–6 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +0.49 2009 1825 141.7 +4.11 -1.32 1.060 51.1% +14 +37 +87 54.4% +0.50 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 100.8 +1.28
28 2015 1537 122.3 +0.24 -2.00 0.920 48.3% +41 +43 +60 44.1% -0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.9 -0.27 2010 1853 154.1 +4.92 +0.47 1.120 52.6% -39 +99 +61 62.1% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 -0.43
29 2016 1480 93.6 -1.39 +0.21 0.729 43.2% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.07 2011 1787 136.6 +2.64 -0.57 1.028 50.6% -5 +48 +103 56.6% +0.32 5–6 (45%) 8–5 (62%) 97.5 +0.59
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1933 142.8 +3.66 +1.17 1.111 52.0% -27 -100 +6 63.6% +0.94 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) 102.3 +2.25
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1725 130.0 +1.40 +0.62 1.039 50.4% +95 +39 — 44.2% +0.10 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 +0.77
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1656 109.1 -1.13 -0.85 0.922 47.9% +85 — — 30.8% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.14
Career — 1801 126.0 +0.36 -1.59 0.927 48.4% -18 +22 +9 46.4% -0.29 25–50 (33%) 27–30 (47%) 92.4 +0.91 — 2089 155.3 +4.43 +1.25 1.140 52.7% -11 +13 -35 61.1% +0.92 116–101 (53%) 76–78 (49%) 96.4 +0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.