H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jarmila Wolfe vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 0-4

Nadia Petrova holds a 4–0 lead over Jarmila Wolfe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2012 US Open first round 6-3 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarmila Wolfe
AUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 29, 2012* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Nadia Petrova #22 6-3 7-6(3) Jarmila Wolfe #99 Match data
May 4, 2012* Estoril WTA 250 R16 Clay Nadia Petrova #35 7-6(2) 0-0 (ret.) Jarmila Wolfe #55 Match data
Aug 8, 2011 Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Nadia Petrova #28 6-1 6-2 Jarmila Wolfe #29 Match data
Sep 23, 2010* Seoul WTA 250 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #19 6-3 6-2 Jarmila Wolfe #41 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,799 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,538 0 0 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0
21 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,505 0 0 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0
22 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0
23 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,687 0 1 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1
24 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,696 0 2 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6
25 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,509 0 2 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
26 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
27 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,555 0 2 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,480 0 2 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 — — — — — — — 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 — — — — — — — 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13