H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Jarmila Wolfe vs Nudnida Luangnam H2H: 0-1

Nudnida Luangnam holds a 1–0 lead over Jarmila Wolfe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nudnida Luangnam leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nudnida Luangnam won the 2012 Guangzhou round of 32 6-7(5) 6-4 6-2.

AUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
THA Age 39 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nudnida Luangnam 6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 Jarmila Wolfe #117 Match data Sep 20, 2012* R32 Guangzhou WTA 250 Hard

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,800 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nudnida Luangnam #336 #336 153 1,500 2 10 16.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Nudnida Luangnam
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0
17 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0
18 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,537 0 0
19 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% 1,488 0 0
20 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% 1,470 0 0
21 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,504 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% 1,454 0 0
22 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,563 0 0
23 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,688 0 1 2010 0–1 0.0% 1,437 0 0
24 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,697 0 2 2011 0–1 0.0% 1,435 0 0
25 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,510 0 2 2012 1–3 25.0% 1,431 0 0
26 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2 2013 1–2 33.3% 1,431 0 0
27 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,555 0 2
28 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2
29 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,479 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Nudnida Luangnam
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2003 2 1 3 66.7%
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2005 2 2 4 50.0%
19 2006 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2007 2 10 12 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2008 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2009 2 8 10 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2010 10 7 17 58.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 2010 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2011 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2012 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 2013 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2015 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 2016 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 65 89 154 42.2% 27 29 56 48.2% 12 18 30 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 10 12 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Nudnida Luangnam
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
16 2003 1532 109.1 +33 66.7% +1.17 -0.13
17 2004 1515 97.3 0.0% -2.50 +0.09
18 2005 1538 107.7 -8 50.0% -0.63 1–0 -0.15
19 2006 1533 102.2 +1 +11 +27 40.9% -0.55 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) +1.33 2006 1489 99.3 0.0% -3.50 +0.03
20 2007 1475 97.8 -41 +56 35.6% -0.98 1–4 (20%) 0–2 +1.18 2007 1470 92.8 0.0% -4.50 +0.28
21 2008 1505 117.9 -2 35.0% -1.15 1–1 2–3 (40%) -0.12 2008 1455 91.2 0.0% -5.50 +0.13
22 2009 1563 119.3 -97 +18 +22 43.4% -0.75 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) -0.33
23 2010 1689 133.8 -91 -65 -29 61.4% +1.03 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) +1.72 2010 1438 98.4 -1.12 -0.15 0.762 43.9% 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–1 +0.22
24 2011 1698 138.0 -35 -1 -32 55.3% +0.24 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) -0.93 2011 1436 103.1 +0.77 +3.68 0.537 34.1% 0.0% -5.00 -0.24
25 2012 1510 111.2 +23 +130 33.3% -1.22 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) +0.32 2012 1431 98.5 -3.95 -3.14 0.612 40.6% +20 22.2% -2.00 1–0 0–1 -0.02
26 2013 1536 111.3 +13 50.0% +0.14 1–1 +0.18 2013 1431 93.1 -1.66 -2.69 0.756 44.2% +11 28.6% -1.71 1–0 0–1 +0.16
27 2014 1555 120.0 +0.80 -1.14 0.972 49.3% +14 47.4% -0.03 2–6 (25%) 2–2 (50%) +0.41
28 2015 1537 122.1 +0.24 -2.00 0.920 48.3% +42 +43 +60 44.1% -0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) -0.17
29 2016 1480 93.7 -1.39 +0.20 0.729 43.2% 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 +0.06
30 2017 1439
32 2019 1430 97.1
33 2020 1416 98.9
Career 1801 126.0 +0.36 -1.59 0.927 48.4% -18 +22 +9 46.4% -0.29 25–50 (33%) 27–30 (47%) +1.44 1500 90.5 -2.15 -1.75 0.666 41.5% +16 18.5% -2.67 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) +4.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.