H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Jarmila Wolfe vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 2-1

Jarmila Wolfe holds a 2–1 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jarmila Wolfe leads 2–0 on clay, while Virginie Razzano leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2011 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarmila Wolfe
AUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 24, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Jarmila Wolfe #26 6-3 6-1 Virginie Razzano #96 Match data
Jan 21, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Virginie Razzano #56 6-1 6-7(2) 6-4 Jarmila Wolfe #86 Match data
Apr 18, 2003* Budapest WTA 250 R16 Clay Jarmila Wolfe #472 6-3 7-5 Virginie Razzano #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,799 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Virginie Razzano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0
18 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,538 0 0 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0
19 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0
20 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0
21 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,505 0 0 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0
22 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0
23 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,687 0 1 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0
24 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,696 0 2 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2
25 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,509 0 2 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2
26 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2
27 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,555 0 2 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2
28 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2
29 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,480 0 2 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2