H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jarmila Wolfe vs Yung Jan Chan H2H: 1-1
Jarmila Wolfe and Yung Jan Chan are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jarmila Wolfe leads 1–0 on clay, while Yung Jan Chan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2010 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jarmila Wolfe | 6-2 6-3 | Yung Jan Chan | Match data |
| Sep 21, 2007* | Kolkata | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Yung Jan Chan | 6-1 6-2 | Jarmila Wolfe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarmila Wolfe | #623 | #25 | 2,060 | 1,799 | 104 | 137 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Yung Jan Chan | — | — | — | 1,640 | 49 | 83 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jarmila Wolfe | Yung Jan Chan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #195 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #42 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #183 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #238 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |