H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Anna Blinkova H2H: 1-2
Anna Blinkova holds a 2–1 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anna Blinkova leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2024 Australian Open third round 7-6(1) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2024* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 7-6(1) 6-4 | Anna Blinkova | Match data |
| Oct 16, 2022* | Transylvania Open | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Anna Blinkova | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Jan 22, 2020* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Anna Blinkova | 7-5 6-4 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Anna Blinkova | #102 | #35 | 1,300 | 1,796 | 103 | 155 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Anna Blinkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #138 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #95 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #154 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #50 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 12–25 | 32.4% | #77 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #62 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |