H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Barbora Krejcikova H2H: 1-1
Jasmine Paolini and Barbora Krejcikova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Barbora Krejcikova leads 1–0 on grass, while Jasmine Paolini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2025 Cincinnati fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2025 | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 6-1 6-2 | Barbora Krejcikova | Match data |
| Jul 13, 2024 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | F | Grass | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 167 | 101 | 62.3% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #32 | 1,943 | 2 | 8 |