H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Jasmine Paolini vs Camila Osorio.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 7-5 7-5 | Camila Osorio | Match data | Aug 13, 2023 | Q2 | Cincinnati Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #21 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,056 | 176 | 138 | 56.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Camila Osorio | #59 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,826 | 104 | 96 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Camila Osorio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #55 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,718 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #59 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #53 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #4 | 1,973 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,003 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #21 | 1,891 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Camila Osorio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 2018 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 23 | 2019 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2020 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2021 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 19 | 15 | 34 | 55.9% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 24 | 14 | 38 | 63.2% | 13 | 3 | 16 | 81.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 104 | 81 | 185 | 56.2% | 57 | 45 | 102 | 55.9% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | — | 47 | 58 | 105 | 44.8% | 52 | 25 | 77 | 67.5% | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 293/315 of Jasmine Paolini's and 184/202 of Camila Osorio's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Camila Osorio | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 60.0% | 61.9% | 32.1% | 58.3% | 28.6% | 50.0% | 36.9% |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 7.0 | 57.8% | 62.9% | 46.8% | 57.1% | 41.6% | 56.3% | 47.6% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 29/30 | 1.4 | 5.3 | 63.1% | 61.1% | 38.4% | 51.1% | 49.0% | 52.7% | 48.0% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 30/31 | 1.2 | 4.1 | 68.6% | 59.0% | 40.9% | 50.2% | 44.0% | 53.3% | 44.7% |
| 21 | 2017 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 57.7% | 43.8% | 38.8% | 63.0% | 0.0% | 40.4% | 28.4% | 2023 | 32/32 | 0.7 | 5.3 | 64.2% | 60.6% | 42.3% | 50.7% | 40.1% | 53.9% | 44.9% |
| 22 | 2018 | 8/8 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 66.1% | 52.3% | 45.2% | 51.3% | 50.3% | 50.2% | 43.5% | 2024 | 32/35 | 1.2 | 5.0 | 64.8% | 58.9% | 40.8% | 49.3% | 52.1% | 52.4% | 45.4% |
| 23 | 2019 | 15/15 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 66.2% | 56.5% | 45.9% | 54.7% | 50.4% | 52.8% | 41.7% | 2025 | 26/38 | 1.8 | 6.1 | 62.6% | 61.7% | 40.2% | 54.1% | 46.6% | 53.8% | 44.7% |
| 24 | 2020 | 12/12 | 0.7 | 2.9 | 63.6% | 54.1% | 41.6% | 49.3% | 44.2% | 49.7% | 47.1% | 2026 | 31/32 | 1.5 | 5.7 | 63.7% | 62.3% | 44.9% | 50.3% | 52.9% | 55.7% | 45.9% |
| 25 | 2021 | 38/39 | 0.9 | 2.5 | 66.3% | 59.5% | 45.8% | 55.3% | 49.1% | 54.9% | 43.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 40/42 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 66.5% | 59.5% | 46.8% | 53.2% | 49.7% | 55.4% | 43.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 47/48 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 68.3% | 59.0% | 48.4% | 51.4% | 45.2% | 55.7% | 43.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 53/59 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 67.8% | 63.6% | 47.8% | 52.9% | 52.6% | 58.5% | 45.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 51/61 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 68.1% | 62.2% | 49.5% | 52.0% | 49.2% | 57.9% | 45.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 27/29 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 67.8% | 60.6% | 49.2% | 58.9% | 46.2% | 56.5% | 44.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 293/315 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 67.2% | 60.1% | 47.4% | 53.4% | 48.5% | 55.9% | 44.3% | — | 184/202 | 1.3 | 5.3 | 64.4% | 60.6% | 41.4% | 51.0% | 47.3% | 53.7% | 45.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Camila Osorio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1483 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1465 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1454 | 96.2 | -0.76 | -2.99 | 0.738 | 43.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.07 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1488 | 103.3 | +0.83 | +0.51 | 1.091 | 51.8% | — | +17 | — | 62.5% | +0.75 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1483 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1699 | 120.1 | -2.66 | +3.25 | 1.014 | 50.4% | -108 | +13 | -63 | 52.3% | +0.08 | 7–0 (100%) | 3–4 (43%) | 107.0 | -0.69 |
| 20 | 2016 | 1484 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1689 | 126.5 | -2.72 | +0.83 | 0.957 | 48.9% | -8 | +34 | -184 | 48.3% | -0.35 | 3–3 (50%) | 9–7 (56%) | 104.1 | +0.85 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1454 | 95.0 | -0.81 | -0.44 | 0.476 | 36.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.25 | — | — | — | -0.39 | 2023 | 1731 | 132.4 | -1.96 | +1.86 | 0.974 | 49.5% | -54 | +87 | -241 | 52.9% | -0.04 | 6–2 (75%) | 6–3 (67%) | 106.3 | -2.02 |
| 22 | 2018 | 1499 | 110.7 | -1.60 | -1.28 | 0.874 | 47.0% | — | +21 | — | 37.5% | -0.88 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.11 | 2024 | 1757 | 132.8 | -3.36 | +0.94 | 0.954 | 49.1% | -66 | +105 | -187 | 53.8% | +0.01 | 5–9 (36%) | 9–4 (69%) | 100.9 | -0.70 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1587 | 114.9 | -2.75 | -0.55 | 0.884 | 47.2% | -71 | +39 | — | 37.1% | -1.12 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–1 | — | -0.63 | 2025 | 1719 | 136.8 | -2.42 | +1.16 | 0.969 | 49.3% | -24 | +106 | — | 51.7% | +0.08 | 9–5 (64%) | 2–5 (29%) | 101.1 | -0.23 |
| 24 | 2020 | 1550 | 117.8 | -2.87 | +2.21 | 0.937 | 48.4% | -99 | +114 | — | 33.3% | -0.85 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | -0.53 | 2026 | 1745 | 142.0 | -1.21 | +2.79 | 1.037 | 50.9% | +16 | +70 | — | 48.7% | +0.10 | 6–7 (46%) | 3–7 (30%) | 97.1 | -0.99 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1770 | 130.2 | -1.17 | -0.08 | 0.958 | 49.4% | -55 | -35 | — | 47.8% | -0.30 | 9–5 (64%) | 4–2 (67%) | 110.2 | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 1742 | 131.6 | -1.55 | +0.45 | 0.984 | 49.9% | -12 | +2 | — | 50.5% | +0.13 | 11–10 (52%) | 2–7 (22%) | 98.4 | -0.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 1848 | 138.9 | -0.40 | +0.93 | 0.981 | 49.6% | -23 | -12 | -324 | 47.7% | -0.21 | 10–5 (67%) | 5–4 (56%) | 106.5 | -1.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 1973 | 157.6 | +2.06 | +3.44 | 1.105 | 52.2% | -50 | -13 | -140 | 63.3% | +0.79 | 9–9 (50%) | 11–3 (79%) | 105.7 | +0.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 2004 | 161.4 | +1.61 | +2.90 | 1.085 | 52.0% | -5 | +75 | -162 | 62.5% | +0.68 | 11–5 (69%) | 8–5 (62%) | 106.8 | +1.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 1891 | 138.3 | -0.19 | +0.80 | 1.021 | 50.6% | +23 | +89 | +18 | 50.7% | +0.16 | 9–4 (69%) | 1–5 (17%) | 99.0 | +2.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2056 | 144.8 | -0.10 | +1.43 | 1.005 | 50.3% | -26 | +27 | -129 | 52.4% | +0.10 | 65–40 (62%) | 33–28 (54%) | 112.0 | +0.46 | — | 1826 | 136.1 | -2.32 | +1.76 | 0.984 | 49.7% | -34 | +69 | -164 | 51.3% | -0.01 | 37–27 (58%) | 32–31 (51%) | 106.7 | -1.81 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | 6 | 1 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 3 | 4 | 7 | Nov 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 1 | 6 | 7 | Nov 2, 2025 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 4 | 3 | 7 | Oct 18, 2025 | H2H |
| Caroline Garcia | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 11, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Li | 2 | 4 | 6 | Aug 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Kamilla Rakhimova | 5 | 0 | 5 | Sep 10, 2025 | H2H |
| Ons Jabeur | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 16, 2025 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Anna Kalinskaya | 2 | 2 | 4 | May 30, 2026 | H2H |