H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Carla Suárez Navarro H2H: 0-1
Carla Suárez Navarro holds a 1–0 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carla Suárez Navarro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carla Suárez Navarro won the 2017 Bastad third round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 37
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2017* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Carla Suárez Navarro | 6-1 6-0 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Carla Suárez Navarro | #342 | #6 | 4,015 | 2,022 | 339 | 247 | 57.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Carla Suárez Navarro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #49 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #17 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #17 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 1,812 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |