H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Emma Navarro H2H: 1-3
Emma Navarro holds a 3–1 lead over Jasmine Paolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Emma Navarro leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Jasmine Paolini leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2024 Wimbledon quarterfinal 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 25
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2024* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Jasmine Paolini | 6-2 6-1 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
| Mar 24, 2024* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Emma Navarro | 6-2 3-6 6-0 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2024* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Emma Navarro | 6-3 7-5 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
| Sep 13, 2023* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Emma Navarro | 7-5 6-0 | Jasmine Paolini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Emma Navarro | #26 | #8 | 3,879 | 1,997 | 110 | 81 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Emma Navarro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #466 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #242 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #15 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |