H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Jasmine Paolini holds a 2–1 lead over Iva Jovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jasmine Paolini leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Iva Jovic won the 2026 Australian Open third round 6-2 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Jovic | 6-2 7-6(3) | Jasmine Paolini | Match data | Jan 23, 2026 | R32 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Jasmine Paolini | 6-3 6-3 | Iva Jovic | Match data | Aug 27, 2025 | R64 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Jasmine Paolini | 7-6(3) 1-6 6-3 | Iva Jovic | Match data | Mar 8, 2025 | R64 | Indian Wells Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #21 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,056 | 176 | 138 | 56.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Iva Jovic | #14 | #14 | 2,691 | 1,948 | 49 | 28 | 63.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Iva Jovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #35 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,941 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #53 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #4 | 1,973 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,003 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #21 | 1,891 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jasmine Paolini | Iva Jovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1512 | 109.4 | -1.24 | +1.84 | 1.103 | 51.6% | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.60 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.06 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1746 | 132.9 | -0.25 | +1.46 | 1.037 | 51.0% | -42 | -200 | — | 56.1% | +0.39 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–2 (60%) | 102.3 | +1.53 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1941 | 155.2 | +2.61 | +3.51 | 1.166 | 53.3% | -68 | -241 | -1 | 64.4% | +1.03 | 8–8 (50%) | 7–6 (54%) | 101.8 | +0.51 |
| 20 | 2016 | 1484 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 1454 | 95.0 | -0.81 | -0.44 | 0.476 | 36.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.25 | — | — | — | -0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 1499 | 110.7 | -1.60 | -1.28 | 0.874 | 47.0% | — | +21 | — | 37.5% | -0.88 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 1587 | 114.9 | -2.75 | -0.55 | 0.884 | 47.2% | -71 | +39 | — | 37.1% | -1.12 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–1 | — | -0.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 1550 | 117.8 | -2.87 | +2.21 | 0.937 | 48.4% | -99 | +114 | — | 33.3% | -0.85 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | -0.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 1770 | 130.2 | -1.17 | -0.08 | 0.958 | 49.4% | -55 | -35 | — | 47.8% | -0.30 | 9–5 (64%) | 4–2 (67%) | 110.2 | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2022 | 1742 | 131.6 | -1.55 | +0.45 | 0.984 | 49.9% | -12 | +2 | — | 50.5% | +0.13 | 11–10 (52%) | 2–7 (22%) | 98.4 | -0.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 1848 | 138.9 | -0.40 | +0.93 | 0.981 | 49.6% | -23 | -12 | -324 | 47.7% | -0.21 | 10–5 (67%) | 5–4 (56%) | 106.5 | -1.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 1973 | 157.6 | +2.06 | +3.44 | 1.105 | 52.2% | -50 | -13 | -140 | 63.3% | +0.79 | 9–9 (50%) | 11–3 (79%) | 105.7 | +0.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 2004 | 161.4 | +1.61 | +2.90 | 1.085 | 52.0% | -5 | +75 | -162 | 62.5% | +0.68 | 11–5 (69%) | 8–5 (62%) | 106.8 | +1.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2026 | 1891 | 138.3 | -0.19 | +0.80 | 1.021 | 50.6% | +24 | +89 | +18 | 50.7% | +0.16 | 9–4 (69%) | 1–5 (17%) | 99.0 | +2.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2056 | 144.8 | -0.10 | +1.43 | 1.005 | 50.3% | -26 | +27 | -129 | 52.4% | +0.10 | 65–40 (62%) | 33–28 (54%) | 112.0 | +0.46 | — | 1949 | 146.8 | +1.68 | +2.88 | 1.125 | 52.6% | -58 | -231 | -1 | 61.7% | +0.82 | 13–13 (50%) | 10–8 (56%) | 102.8 | +2.57 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | 6 | 1 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 3 | 4 | 7 | Nov 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 1 | 6 | 7 | Nov 2, 2025 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 4 | 3 | 7 | Oct 18, 2025 | H2H |
| Caroline Garcia | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 11, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | 4 | 0 | 4 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Alexandra Eala | 3 | 0 | 3 | Sep 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Jasmine Paolini | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 23, 2026 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 7, 2026 | H2H |